Applied Cybernetics Group Sat, Nov 7, 2026 · data 12:17Z
thrunt.me thrunt me harder

coverage gap

Technique
T1564.010
Tactics
Defense Evasion
Research, 90 days
1
KEV CVEs mapped
0
SigmaHQ rules
0
Elastic, Splunk
0
thrunt rules
0
Upstream
https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1564/010

MITRE description

Adversaries may attempt to hide process command-line arguments by overwriting process memory. Process command-line arguments are stored in the process environment block (PEB), a data structure used by Windows to store various information about/used by a process. The PEB includes the process command-line arguments that are referenced when executing the process. When a process is created, defensive tools/sensors that monitor process creations may retrieve the process arguments from the PEB.(Citation: Microsoft PEB 2021)(Citation: Xpn Argue Like Cobalt 2019) Adversaries may manipulate a process PEB to evade defenses. For example, [Process Hollowing](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1055/012) can be abused to spawn a process in a suspended state with benign arguments. After the process is spawned and the PEB is initialized (and process information is potentially logged by tools/sensors), adversaries may override the PEB to modify the command-line arguments (ex: using the [Native API](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1106) <code>WriteProcessMemory()</code> function) then resume process execution with malicious arguments.(Citation: Cobalt Strike Arguments 2019)(Citation: Xpn Argue Like Cobalt 2019)(Citation: Nviso Spoof Command Line 2020) Adversaries may also execute a process with malicious command-line arguments then patch the memory with benign arguments that may bypass subsequent process memory analysis.(Citation: FireEye FiveHands April 2021) This behavior may also be combined with other tricks (such as [Parent PID Spoofing](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1134/004)) to manipulate or further evade process-based detections.

Research citing this technique

Reports and advisories from the last 90 days that cite this technique.

Detection coverage

No rule covers this technique yet. No SigmaHQ, Elastic or Splunk production rule carries its tag, and thrunt hasn't written one. Techniques like this are where the next thrunt rules come from; the gap map has the full list.

Signal counts reflect the current corpus snapshot. Research citations are the technique IDs named in vendor reports and government advisories from the last 90 days; KEV mappings come from MITRE CTID. Coverage is the SigmaHQ rule inventory (core, emerging-threats, threat-hunting) plus Elastic and Splunk production rules. Rule bodies are not mirrored; links go upstream.